Formalizing Set Theory
See: Formalizing Predicate Logic, Set Theory
Formalize the following without set builder notation
- The set of tall students who like basketball
\text{Students} \cap \text{Cdn} \cap (\text{LikeVolleyball} \cup \text{LikeHockey})
Formalize the following without set builder notation as WFF:
- No one from Shrek's Swamp has a favourite colour blue
& \text{FromShreksSwamp} \cap \text{FavColBlue} = \emptyset \
& \text{FavColBlue} \subseteq \text{FromShreksSwamp}^\complement
\end
\begin{align}
& (\text{LikeHockey} \cup \text{LikeBaskemtball}) - \text{FavColRed} \subseteq \text{FromOhio} \
& (\text{LikeHockey} \cup \text{LikeBaskemtball}) \cap \text{FavColRed}^\complement \subseteq \text{FromOhio}
\end
Formalizing Relations
See Relations
Using the following sets:
Formalize these sentences:
- All houses that are rented are owned
or - Not every student owns a house
or this one assumes that - Students who rent houses do not own any dwellings
\op{dom}(\text{Students} \triangleleft \text{rents} \triangleright \text{Houses}) \triangleleft \text{owns} = \emptyset
\text{owns} \triangleright \text{Houses} \subseteq \text